| nettime's digest on Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:39:28 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> Refugees in Australia [3x] |
Table of Contents:
Woomera reverts to pre-UN policy on visitors
Dave/Ross <ross777au@bigpond.com>
Re: <nettime> Children Placed in Punishment Compound
Plasma Studii <office@plasmastudii.org>
Worst I've seen, says UN asylum inspector
"ben moretti" <bmoretti@chariot.net.au>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 09:08:56 +1000
From: Dave/Ross <ross777au@bigpond.com>
Subject: Woomera reverts to pre-UN policy on visitors
Woomera Reverts to Pre-U.N. Policy on Visitors
The ACM and DIMIA staff at the Woomera Detention Centre have returned
to an obstructionist approach to visitors once again, following the
departure of U.N. investigators.
To our knowledge, the most successful visitor in the history of the
centre, Matt Damon, succeeded in getting three visits on successive
days: the day of the U.N. visit, and the day before and the day
after. However, the next person to ask permission to visit detainees
was told that one of the two women she wanted to visit flatly refused
to see her, even though the visitor had a letter from the detainee
requesting a visit. The visitor then asked for permission to return
to visit other detainees who had requested a visit from her, and she
was told that the staff at the centre were "too busy" to be bothered
with visitors until the following weekend.
When a member of the ACM staff was asked how many visitors had
arrived during the week to see the more than 200 people being
detained there, she replied, "Only you." In other words, a centre
which gets almost no requests for members of the public to visit
detainees is operating on a policy of no visitors at all being
allowed in during the week, on top of the usual excuses for denying
access on the weekends.
Requests by mail from other people have either not been answered, or
they have been answered with confusing arguments and questions which
appear to be aimed at finding excuses to deny access. People are
asked how they managed to make contact with the detainees in the
first place (and we already know that alleged associations with any
of the 2,000 or so refugee advocates who attended the Easter
demonstrations has been used as an excuse to deny access). In other
words, if they admit that they got the names and numbers of the
detainees (which are a closely guarded secret within ACM and DIMIA
circles) from activists who are campaigning for refugee rights, then
it may be enough to warrant them being barred from visiting, as is
the case with the Refugee Embassy staff based in Woomera, who would
like to visit detainees on a full-time basis. (Connections with the
Refugee Embassy must also be hidden, which is why this report is not
being too specific about the sources of information used in preparing
it.)
People who list more than one or two people that they would like to
visit are treated with suspicion. And those who wish to return the
next day to see the same people get a similar grilling about why they
should need more than the one visit. If you forget a name or
mispronounce it, this is given as evidence that you must not really
know the person you are visiting. And the staff all insist that this
is being done to "protect the rights of the detainees". This, in
spite of the fact that more than seventy detainees have filled out
forms stating that they would like a visit from ANYONE who will make
the effort to travel to Woomera to see them.
This policy of obstructing visits from friendly Australians is one of
the cruellest tricks of the Ruddock-Howard administration, in their
efforts to keep the public from seeing the human face of the
detainees, and to keep the detainees from receiving any hope or
encouragement from Australians. It is no wonder that angry
Australians would think of tearing down fences, and desperate
detainees would risk their lives to escape, when legal visits
(something freely available to the worst criminals in Australia) are
blocked consistently, week after week and year after year. Most
detainees at Woomera have never received a single visit from a
friendly Australian, apart from their lawyers.
Something must be done about this.
Dave McKay
Refugee Embassy
Woomera
Phone: 0407-238805
- --
for the moment, mail to fold@idl.net.au will be automatically
forwarded to ross777au@bigpond.com, so you may reply to either
address and it will reach me.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:22:56 -0400
From: Plasma Studii <office@plasmastudii.org>
Subject: Re: <nettime> Children Placed in Punishment Compound
>Children Placed in Punishment Compound
If they took the children away from the mothers that were going to be
punished, would that make anyone any happier?
>The much vaunted program to put refugee women and children into
>community housing in the township of Woomera is suffering from a
>philosophy of punitive action byACM staff, according to a report from
>the Refugee Embassy at Woomera.
>
>Women and children who misbehave while living in the township are not
>only being returned to imprisonment behind razor wire, [ ... ]
If you had to isolate some "misbehaver" from the rest of a refugee
camp would you put them up in a hotel?
>but in some
>cases, they are even being placed in the dreaded Oscar Compound,
>which is used as a punishment area for the most troublesome
>prisoners
Like the "misbehavers" that do something that deserves imprisonment?
Sounds like a case of just looking for some issue to get outraged
about. Which would be harmless by itself. but has the effect that
if there really is a greater issue (evil prison system), the decision
makers will have this protest to site as proof that they are
justified because this opposition is so trivial and misdirected.
judson
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PLASMA STUDII
http://plasmastudii.org
223 E 10th Street
PMB 130
New York, NY 10003
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:08:14 +0950
From: "ben moretti" <bmoretti@chariot.net.au>
Subject: Worst I've seen, says UN asylum inspector
[What, so the Government spruce up of the detention centre
*didn't* fool the UN inspectors? I mean they probably spent a
couple of thousand dollars putting in lovely trees and murals
of happy refugees, they even built them a children's
playground. It is no wonder that the ruling Coalition
government wants to block moves for Australia to ratify a
convention for the establishment of an International Court -
they would probably be up on charges within a year or two. Ben]
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/06/05/1022982721514.html
Worst I've seen, says UN asylum inspector
By Michael Millett
June 6 2002
The United Nations has expressed its disgust at Australia's
mandatory detention system, describing the Howard Government's
policy of locking up asylum seekers for long periods as a
gross abuse of human rights.
The stinging condemnation came yesterday from the head of a
special UN delegation during private talks with two senior
Government ministers.
The Herald has learnt that the head of the UN Working Group on
Arbitrary Detention, Louis Joinet, warned the Government he
would declare his objections at a press conference today.
It is understood that Mr Joinet privately told welfare groups
he had not seen a more gross abuse of human rights in more
than 40 inspections of mandatory detention facilities around
the world.
The UN's dismay was conveyed in separate meetings with the
Immigration Minister, Philip Ruddock, and the Foreign
Minister, Alexander Downer.
Today's public condemnation will be a severe embarrassment for
the Government, given its repeated assurances that its
treatment of asylum cases - notably its rigid adherence to a
policy of mandatory detention - does not breach international
standards.
Mr Ruddock has touted the system as a model for other
countries to follow in dealing with mass people movements.
This week he told Parliament that a number of European
countries, including Britain, had begun implementing elements
of the Australian approach.
But Mr Ruddock has been in conflict with the judiciary over
his handling of immigration, and the detention system was
criticised by another UN representative, Justice
Prafullachandra Bhagwati, in private talks with the Government
last week. The judge, an envoy for the UN High Commissioner
for Human Rights, Mary Robinson, and Mr Joinet's team have
just finished inspecting a number of detention centres.
The tours - tightly orchestrated by the Government amid
accusations that millions of dollars were spent sprucing up
the centres - included visits to Port Hedland, Woomera and
Villawood.
The UN inspectors spent several hours interviewing detainees
about camp conditions.
Mr Joinet's meeting with Mr Downer was delayed until late last
night, giving the Government little time to prepare for the
political fallout.
But Mr Downer told Mr Joinet the mandatory detention policy
was deemed to be very successful and there was "no reason to
modify it".
The Government had been bracing for an adverse finding since
it gave grudging acceptance earlier this year to the
inspections.
The visitors' findings bring the Government into direct
confrontation with the UN.
But the mandatory detention policy has strong public support.
While Labor is split over the issue, the Opposition Leader,
Simon Crean, has vowed to retain mandatory detention.
- --
ben moretti
mailto:bmoretti@chariot.net.au
http://www.chariot.net.au/~bmoretti
__o
_`\<,_
(*)/ (*)
------------------------------
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net